By Canadian Press

UK judge rules that newspaper invaded Meghan’s privacy

Feb 11, 2021 | 10:13 AM

LONDON — A newspaper invaded Duchess of Sussex’s privacy by publishing personal letter to her estranged father, a British judge ruled Thursday, in a major victory for the royal in her campaign against what she sees as media intrusion.

The former Meghan Markle, 39, sued publisher Associated Newspapers for invasion of privacy and copyright infringement over five February 2019 articles in the Mail on Sunday and on the MailOnline website that published large portions of a letter to her father, Thomas Markle.

High Court judge Mark Warby ruled that the publisher had misused the duchess’s private information.

He said the duchess “had a reasonable expectation that the contents of the letter would remain private. The Mail articles interfered with that reasonable expectation.”

Associated Newspapers contested the claim, and a trial was scheduled for the fall. It would have been one of the most high-profile civil legal showdowns in London for years.

WHAT'S ON

Here is what's on this weekend in Medicine Hat and area: Dec. 13-15

Dec 14, 2024

IN THE COMMUNITY

Medicine Hat's Mustard Seed adding new shelter spaces at Alberta government's request

Dec 12, 2024

HOLIDAYS

Medicine Hat Kiwanis hosting Christmas dinner, applications due Friday

Dec 12, 2024

But at hearings last month, lawyers for the duchess asked for a summary judgment to settle the case without a trial.

The judge agreed, saying the disclosures of Meghan’s private letter “were manifestly excessive and hence unlawful.”

“There is no prospect that a different judgment would be reached after a trial,” he said.

Meghan’s lawyers say the “deeply personal” five-page letter was intended for her father alone. Her attorney Justin Rushbrooke argued in January that the publisher had “no real prospect” of winning the case.

But the defence argued Meghan wrote the letter as part of a media strategy to rebut a negative view conveyed by her father, and with help from the communications team in the royal couple’s Kensington Palace office.

Thursday’s ruling means Meghan has won her case on privacy grounds, but the judge said a “limited trial” should be held to decide who owns the copyright to the letter.

The defence argues that multiple people may be copyright-holders because more than one person contributed to the letter.

The judge said that argument “cannot be described as convincing, and seems improbable,” but should still be decided at a trial.

Meghan, an American actress and star of TV legal drama “Suits,” married Harry, a grandson of Queen Elizabeth II, at Windsor Castle in May 2018. Their son, Archie, was born the following year.

In early 2020, Meghan and Harry announced they were quitting royal duties and moving to North America, citing what they said were the unbearable intrusions and racist attitudes of the British media. They recently bought a house in Santa Barbara, California.

Jill Lawless, The Associated Press