ATA calls Bill 15 a government power grab

“The design of the entire new system from bottom to top is very susceptible to political influence, and the entire discipline process is at risk of being further politicized,” says Schilling. “This level of political interference is definitely not in the interests of the public or the profession. This is nothing less than a blatant grab for power.”

Fundamental Flaw #2, according to the ATA: Bill 15 completely removes the notion of self-governance for teachers.

ATA officials say the commissioner is appointed by cabinet; the hearing committee is appointed by the minister. The ATA says teachers are completely excluded from naming those who will adjudicate and govern their profession. The organization says no other profession in Alberta has a commissioner to govern the profession.

“Self-regulation is a hallmark of professionalism, so why does the government believe that teachers as professionals are not capable of regulating themselves?” asks Schilling. “They would rather have a political appointee take teachers to task. How can teachers trust the people who appointed Chris Champion to write curriculum?”

Fundamental Flaw #3, according to the ATA: The government is adopting the model used only by BC, which has notoriously poor relations with its teachers.

The government, as key justification for this bill, has repeatedly said that Alberta is the only province that uses teachers’ unions for regulating the profession. This is not true, says the ATA. However, it is true that a commissioner is used in only one other province: British Columbia, say ATA officials.

“We should not be adopting the BC model for public education in Alberta,” says Schilling. “The culture of professional and labour relations in BC’s public education system is adversarial, lacks trust and is rife with conflict. In Alberta, our education system’s culture is based on collegiality and collaboration—largely because the ATA’s current role requires it to mind the public interest.”

Schilling says there are other flaws in the bill as well, including how the public registry will be used, and unclear and unrealistic expectations about how the transition from old model to new model will occur. Schilling says he is very concerned that the government seems to be completely unaware of the complexity, difficulty and scope of this work if they think they can have the commissioner’s office ready to take it over in just eight months.

But ultimately, say ATA officials, Schilling’s original concerns from last week remain: this bill is being brought forward not because it is what is best for students or public education. Rather, it is a vindictive attack and a sad effort to distract from the government’s infighting and the minister’s own inability to handle the education file.

“If we can’t trust the government to get curriculum right, how can we trust them to get this right?” suggests Schilling.

by rdnewsNOW Staff

ATA calls Bill 15 a government power grab

Our Community