By Canadian Press

Federal watchdog says victims-rights regime needs overhaul after falling ‘far short’

Nov 25, 2020 | 3:02 PM

OTTAWA, Ill. — Canada’s watchdog for crime victims is calling on Parliament to overhaul their bill of rights, saying the five-year-old legislation has fallen “far short” of delivering on its promise.

Rules meant to amplify victims’ voices in the justice system have failed to make them heard following “sporadic” implementation of a regime that needs more teeth, clarity and public awareness, federal ombudsman Heidi Illingworth said in a report Wednesday.

The previous Conservative government introduced what it called a victims’ bill of rights in 2015 that allowed crime victims to get information about offenders in the corrections system and have their views considered when decisions are made about those perpetrators.

Illingworth said the legislation should be amended to provide a legal remedy for violations, such as allowing victims to formally challenge authorities on whether their legal rights have been honoured.

“The situation of victims of crime has not fundamentally changed since it was passed,” she wrote.

WHAT'S ON

Here is what's on this weekend in Medicine Hat and area: Dec. 13-15

Dec 14, 2024

IN THE COMMUNITY

Medicine Hat's Mustard Seed adding new shelter spaces at Alberta government's request

Dec 12, 2024

HOLIDAYS

Medicine Hat Kiwanis hosting Christmas dinner, applications due Friday

Dec 12, 2024

The justice system demands heavy lifting from people subjected to a crime, including those involved in the 2.2 million violent crimes per year.

“They are expected to report the crime, provide evidence, bear witness, be cross-examined on the stand and relive their traumas over and over again as they tell their truths — yet we provide them with little assistance to do so,” Illingworth said.

“Unsupported victims are less likely to come forward. When victims are not treated as full partners in the criminal justice system, the system is less effective.”

Up to two-thirds of crime victims do not go to the police, said Irvin Waller, professor emeritus in criminology at the University of Ottawa. “And they have reasons for not going to the police.”

Other reforms demanded in the report include a simplified complaint process filtered entirely through the ombudsman’s office rather than a patchwork of agencies, more clearly defined obligations for criminal justice officials and more funding to train front-line workers in treating victims with “courtesy, compassion and respect.”

The ombudsman is also calling for better data collection by courts, prisons and law enforcement agencies to understand police interactions with targeted populations, including Indigenous women and LGBTQ individuals.

Waller pointed to England and France as models on training guidelines for officials and restitution for victims, respectively. He said up to half of French criminal cases result in restitution payments, access to which should be guaranteed, according to the ombudsman’s report.

In contrast to Canada, France also grants victims legal “standing” to appeal to courts for review when their rights are not upheld.

“We are a long, long way behind these countries,” Waller said.

Illingworth’s report further recommends amendments that commit to core funding for community-based restorative justice programs as well as a list of officials who have direct responsibilities to crime victims.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 25, 2020.

Christopher Reynolds, The Canadian Press