‘Friends of Science’ thanks Elections Canada for warning on climate-change talk

Environment groups targeted by Friends of Science say the group’s response is exactly why they were concerned about Elections Canada’s decision over the summer that climate change could be considered a debatable political topic rather than scientific fact.

Tim Gray, executive director of the charity Environmental Defence, said Elections Canada’s move has opened up a “crazy space” where charities can’t release paid communications — advertising — on scientific facts for the duration of a critical election campaign.

Most polls suggest climate change and the environment are bigger issues for Canadian voters than ever before, driven by both scientific findings and people’s lived experiences of more frequent floods and forest fires.

Most mainstream political parties in Canada agree there is a scientific consensus that climate change is real, mostly caused by humans’ burning fossil fuels, and a growing threat to the safety and security of Canadians and people around the world. Which party has the best policies to address it is expected to be a key question for voters.

But Elections Canada warned some environment groups over the summer that any paid communications on the veracity of climate change could be considered a partisan issue after a formal election call, because People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier has a platform that denies both that climate change is caused by people and that it is an emergency.

The Canada Elections Act puts restrictions on third-party advertising during campaigns, affecting any ads on any issue any party brings up during the writ period. The rules don’t prevent third parties from talking about such issues, but once the cost of ads hits $500 they have to register as third parties trying to influence the election’s outcome.

Gray said tax law requires charities to be non-partisan and registering to be able to comment during an election could lead to critics’ accusing environment charities of being partisan.

More than 350 Canadian scientists wrote to Elections Canada in August asking it to reconsider the warning, but the organization says it is simply following the Canada Elections Act.

Michelle Stirling, communications manager for Friends of Science, said the organization hasn’t made a formal complaint to either Elections Canada or the Canada Revenue Agency about partisan activity by charities yet, but will consider doing so if circumstances warrant.

She pointed to a campaign by the David Suzuki Foundation calling for school children to participate in a global climate strike on Sept. 27. The date falls squarely inside the federal campaign period, which legally has to begin no later than Sept. 15 for the Oct. 21 vote.

“How is this charitable activity?” Stirling asked. “I think that the CRA should probably consider whether or not this is charitable activity and whether or not this is suitable in the time of elections.”

Suzuki Foundation CEO Stephen Cornish said the climate strikes are an international movement based on scientific evidence.

“Friends of Science trying to argue that science shouldn’t be part of the debate seems more intent to stifle free speech or to hinder the work of charities than to seriously advance the debate in this country,” he said.

“I think we’re on very solid ground in discussing climate change. Climate change cannot be a partisan issue. It is a scientific fact.”

Still, the foundation is stopping all online advertising once the campaign begins, which Cornish said is a big imposition during a time when more Canadians than ever will be craving information on climate change.

“It’s a handcuffing of our ability to do our job correctly,” he said.

Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

‘Friends of Science’ thanks Elections Canada for warning on climate-change talk

Our Community