Liberal MP questions Justice Department’s legal advice on fired scientists

Committee members, backed up by parliamentary law clerk Phiippe Dufresne, insist they have the constitutional authority to order the production of any documents they please and that their authority takes precedence over any other laws.

But Christian Roy, director and senior general counsel of health legal services at the Justice Department, says the department has never recognized the power of committees to compel documents in violation of the Privacy Act or other laws.

Oliphant questioned Roy’s legal opinion.

“Lawyers are not always right and Justice lawyers are particularly, in my mind, not always right,” he told the committee.

He noted that Justice lawyers were wrong in claiming a law banning genetic discrimination was unconstitutional, after fighting it all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Moreover, Oliphant said he was “horrified” to discover that Justice lawyers had advised the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to illegally keep potentially revealing electronic data about people over a 10-year period.

“I have learned to now question of Department of Justice lawyers,” Oliphant said, suggesting that Stewart get “a second opinion because the Justice Department is not giving you the best advice.”

The committee voted unanimously later Monday to give PHAC 10 days to turn over unredacted documents about the fired scientists, which the parliamentary law clerk is to review and advise committee members as to what needs to be blacked out to protect privacy, national security and the police investigation.

If the agency continues to refuse to disclose the unredacted documents, the committee will seek an order to do so from the House of Commons.

PHAC formally terminated the employment of Canadian scientists Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, in January.

The pair was escorted out of the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in July 2019 over what Stewart has described as “relating to possible breaches in security protocols.”

The Winnipeg lab is Canada’s only Level Four laboratory, designed to deal safely with deadly contagious germs such as Ebola.

PHAC has previously said the pair’s escorted exit had nothing to do with the fact that four months earlier, Qiu had been responsible for a shipment of Ebola and Henipah viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Stewart has released some redacted documents to the committee about that virus transfer, which he said show that all laws and protocols were followed.

He also assured the committee Monday that there is no link between those viruses and the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, which first surfaced in China’s Wuhan province.

That didn’t stop Conservative MP Michael Chong, who referred to the two fired scientists as being Chinese when they are in fact Canadians.

“There is no doubt that (Qui) trained technicians at that very institute of virology to establish a Level Four lab, the only Level Four lab in the People’s Republic of China, and there is no doubt that the coronavirus emerged ostensibly in Wuhan a number of months later,” Chong said.

He dismissed suggestions that he was peddling a conspiracy theory, citing various experts who’ve posited that the coronavirus may have been inadvertently released from the Wuhan lab.

Oliphant accused Chong of “drawing two threads that are completely unrelated together,” calling it “absolutely irresponsible” and “cheap politics.”

Bloc Quebecois MP Stephane Bergeron agreed that Chong’s language was inflammatory.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 10, 2021.

The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Liberal MP questions Justice Department’s legal advice on fired scientists

Our Community