PETA takes Toronto to court over removal of anti-Canada Goose ads

One ad shows a photograph of a coyote with a caption reading: “I’m a living being, not a piece of fur trim.” Another featured a photo of a goose with the caption: “I’m a living being, not jacket filling.”

Canada Goose has previously fought complaints about its use of fur, saying it is committed to the ethical treatment of animals.

A spokesperson for Bell Media Inc., which owns Astral, said at the time that the ads were not in line the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, which restricts ads from disparaging organizations or causing public ridicule.

PETA claimed it was not violating the standards, and on Tuesday a lawyer for the group said “freedom of speech is the central issue” in the case.

“If PETA had contracted with Astral to clean street furniture, we wouldn’t be here today. We’re talking about the ability to put up important public messages on street furniture,” Gary Grill said.

PETA alleges Astral took the ads down after a single complaint that came from an advertiser for Canada Goose.

In an email to Astral that was filed with court, a director at an advertising agency that works with Canada Goose wrote that the clothing maker had spent “quite a bit of money with Astral over the past year or so.”

“So it was incredibly disappointing that you guys would take this advertising without giving us a heads up … is there anything that can be done here?” Brian Rappaport wrote.

An Astral employee responded that the company was “putting the wheels in motion to remove these ads ASAP.”

Astral told court it warned PETA in advance that if it received just a singe complaint about the ads, they would be taken down. It says it does not allow ads that disparage other organizations, and it would not run anti-PETA advertisements, lawyer Steve Mason said.

“Astral is not picking sides,” Mason said.

He pointed out that PETA’s lawyers signed off on the contract and the company knew the ad could be pulled if a complaint arose.

PETA and intervener Animal Justice are trying to convince an Ontario Divisional Court to undertake a judicial review of the matter.

The three-justice panel hearing the case in Toronto limited oral arguments to whether court had jurisdiction on the matter.

PETA argues Astral is working on behalf of the city, and therefore must act like a public body, which means its decision to remove ads violated PETA’s free-speech rights.

Astral and the city argued the matter is between private companies based on a commercial contract, and thus the court does not have jurisdiction to conduct a judicial review.

The judges reserved their decision.

Canada Goose has long been in PETA’s crosshairs. Members of the group, sometimes dressed as coyotes, have protested in front of the apparel company’s stores and repeatedly billed it as a perpetrator of “shameless cruelty.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 15, 2019.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GOOS), (TSX:BCE)

Liam Casey, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

PETA takes Toronto to court over removal of anti-Canada Goose ads

Our Community